About These Ratings

How Ratings Are Determined

These ratings are not one person's opinion. Every rating is built from the public record and scored against the same published standards, applied the same way to every candidate regardless of party.

  • The evidenceVotes and legislation, public statements and documented actions, and findings by courts, election authorities, or ethics bodies.
  • The standardIntent is not inferred. Only what candidates did or said on the public record counts. Silence is never scored as a violation.
  • The sourcesEvery assessment is cited. Full sources are listed at the bottom of each scorecard.
Read the full methodology →

How to Read This

Colors reflect constitutional accountability based on publicly verifiable conduct. They are not endorsements or predictions of election outcomes. Ratings reflect the severity, pattern, and context of conduct.

Green — Clear constitutional compliance / restraint
Amber — Mixed, limited, or under-articulated record
Red — Clear or repeated constitutional breach

Ohio · U.S. House

OH Constitutional Accountability Scorecard — Summary Table

Contest & Candidate Use of Force Rule of Law Election Integrity
U.S. House (OH-07)
Max Miller (R, incumbent)
Brian Poindexter (D)
U.S. House (OH-09)
Marcy Kaptur (D, incumbent)
Derek Merrin (R)

U.S. House (OH-07) — Candidate Assessments

Max Miller

Republican Incumbent — U.S. House (OH-07)

Use of Force: RedRule of Law: AmberElection Integrity: Red

1. Use of Force — Red

RED

What the Record Shows

  • Miller repeatedly opposed congressional efforts to constrain presidential military action against Iran. In 2026, he voted against six Iran-related War Powers resolutions - H.Con.Res. 38, 40, 75, 86, 89 and 93 - seeking to remove U.S. forces from hostilities not authorized by Congress.
  • Three of those measures ultimately passed the House. Miller voted against them, including H.Con.Res. 89 and H.Con.Res. 93, which directed the President to remove U.S. forces from hostilities with Iran pursuant to the War Powers Resolution.
  • On domestic use of force, Miller has generally supported strong federal immigration enforcement. However, following fatal federal immigration-enforcement operations in Minnesota, he called for transparency and accountability regarding federal use of force.

Why Red

Miller's record on presidential war powers is extensive and consistent. Six votes against congressional efforts to constrain unauthorized U.S. military involvement in Iran demonstrate a repeated willingness to permit broad executive authority over military hostilities.

While Miller has called for accountability regarding specific domestic law-enforcement actions, his repeated War Powers votes demonstrate insufficient respect for Congress's constitutional role in authorizing military force, supporting a Red rating.

2. Rule of Law & Oversight — Amber

AMBER

What the Record Shows

  • Miller has supported measures giving Congress greater control over federal agency rulemaking, reflecting support for congressional authority in that area.
  • Miller supported congressional efforts to expunge President Trump's two impeachments, arguing that doing so would correct what he regarded as previous congressional political overreach.
  • Miller voted for legislation restricting congressional stock trading, providing evidence of support for at least one institutional accountability measure.

Why Amber

Miller's record is mixed. He has supported some measures intended to strengthen congressional authority and governmental accountability while also supporting actions that weaken or challenge other institutional checks on presidential power.

The available evidence therefore does not establish a consistently positive or consistently negative pattern under CIU's Rule of Law & Oversight criteria. Miller receives an Amber.

3. Election Integrity — Red

RED

What the Record Shows

  • Miller continued after the 2020 election to raise unsupported questions about the legitimacy of the result. During his 2022 congressional campaign, he said there had been “a lot of irregularities” in the election that needed to be investigated, despite extensive reviews finding no widespread fraud sufficient to alter the outcome.
  • Miller has repeatedly supported the SAVE Act and related legislation requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for federal voter registration, arguing that these requirements are necessary to ensure that only eligible U.S. citizens vote.

Why Red

Miller's continued promotion of unsupported claims of significant irregularities in the 2020 presidential election is directly relevant to CIU's Election Integrity criteria.

His repeated support for legislation requiring documentary proof of citizenship that could prevent some otherwise eligible citizens from registering to vote if they cannot provide the required documentation provides an additional concern.

Taken together, with the unsupported 2020 election claims carrying particular weight, the record raises significant concerns under CIU's Election Integrity criteria.

Brian Poindexter

Democratic Challenger — U.S. House (OH-07)

Use of Force: AmberRule of Law: AmberElection Integrity: Amber

1. Use of Force — Amber

AMBER

What the Record Shows

  • Poindexter has publicly criticized ICE's tactical use of force following fatal incidents involving federal immigration agents. He has said ICE “absolutely, 100% needs to change their tactics.”
  • He has not called for abolishing ICE and has expressed support for secure borders and immigration enforcement conducted without unnecessary cruelty.
  • Poindexter has called for an end to U.S. involvement in the Iran war, but the available record does not identify a clear position on the constitutional division of war-making authority between Congress and the President.

Why Amber

Poindexter has expressed concern about excessive federal law-enforcement tactics, providing some evidence relevant to CIU's Use of Force criteria. However, the available record provides limited evidence concerning broader constitutional questions involving the exercise of government power, particularly presidential war powers.

Because the evidence is insufficient to establish a clear Green or Red pattern under CIU's criteria, Poindexter receives an Amber.

2. Rule of Law & Oversight — Amber

AMBER

What the Record Shows

  • Poindexter has called for prohibiting members of Congress from trading individual stocks.
  • He has criticized congressional spending practices and emphasized congressional scrutiny of federal expenditures.
  • The available record contains limited evidence concerning Poindexter's positions on executive accountability, separation of powers, judicial authority and congressional oversight.

Why Amber

Poindexter has expressed support for governmental accountability, but his public record is not sufficiently developed to demonstrate a consistent pattern regarding the constitutional and institutional issues CIU evaluates.

Poindexter's limited record does not establish a clear pattern under CIU's Rule of Law & Oversight criteria.

3. Election Integrity — Amber

AMBER

What the Record Shows

  • CIU's research identified little substantive public record from Poindexter concerning the 2020 presidential election, certification of election results, the SAVE Act or comparable election-integrity questions.

Why Amber

The available evidence is insufficient to establish a clear pattern regarding Poindexter's approach to election integrity.

CIU does not treat the absence of evidence as negative conduct; the limited record supports an Amber rating.

U.S. House (OH-09) — Candidate Assessments

Marcy Kaptur

Democratic Incumbent — U.S. House (OH-09)

Use of Force: AmberRule of Law: GreenElection Integrity: Green

1. Use of Force — Amber

AMBER

What the Record Shows

  • Kaptur has repeatedly supported Congress's constitutional role in authorizing military action, including legislation and votes seeking to restrict unauthorized U.S. hostilities with Iran.
  • She has continually called for restraints and greater accountability in federal immigration enforcement. In 2026, she criticized warrantless entries and wrongful detention of U.S. citizens and called for body cameras, visible identification and stronger oversight of ICE and DHS enforcement.
  • Her concerns date to at least 2018, when she criticized a major Ohio ICE workplace raid as using “barbaric tactics” that broke up working families, and later visited detained women to examine their treatment and access to legal representation.
  • In 2024, Kaptur voted against an amendment that would have required the government, with specified exceptions, to obtain a warrant before searching Section 702 surveillance data for Americans’ communications. Section 702 targets foreigners abroad but can result in the warrantless collection of Americans’ private communications. Kaptur subsequently voted to reauthorize Section 702.

Why Amber

Kaptur's record demonstrates repeated support for Congress's constitutional war-powers role, including both legislation and votes restricting unauthorized military action.

Her Section 702 votes, however, provide mixed evidence regarding Fourth Amendment protections by permitting continued warrantless collection and, in some circumstances, searches of Americans’ private communications.

2. Rule of Law & Oversight — Green

GREEN

What the Record Shows

  • Kaptur has repeatedly used her congressional oversight role to challenge executive-branch spending and administrative actions, including requesting GAO review of whether the Department of Energy was complying with federal appropriations laws.
  • In 2026, she pressed DOE to restore reporting, safety and independent-oversight requirements, arguing that Congress cannot effectively conduct oversight without reliable information from executive agencies.
  • Kaptur has called for greater transparency and accountability in federal immigration enforcement, including visible identification, body cameras and stronger use-of-force standards for ICE and CBP.
  • She has also supported congressional ethics reforms, including restrictions on members trading individual stocks.

Why Green

Kaptur's record demonstrates recurring use of congressional oversight to enforce appropriations law, require executive-branch transparency and preserve independent accountability mechanisms.

Her record also includes specific efforts to strengthen congressional ethics and accountability within federal law enforcement.

3. Election Integrity — Green

GREEN

What the Record Shows

  • Kaptur voted to certify the 2020 presidential election and has not challenged the lawful transfer of presidential power.
  • She testified in federal court against Ohio's congressional gerrymandering, describing how the 2011 map divided communities within her district.
  • She has supported expanded voter registration and voting access, including automatic voter registration and expanded mail voting.
  • In 2025, Kaptur voted against the SAVE Act, which would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for federal voter registration and could create registration barriers for eligible voters who lack ready access to the required documents.
  • Kaptur has also supported congressional investigation and oversight concerning foreign efforts to interfere in U.S. elections.

Why Green

Kaptur's record includes acceptance of certified election results, support for voting access and opposition to partisan gerrymandering and foreign interference in U.S. elections.

Her record spans several dimensions of CIU's Election Integrity criteria, including lawful election outcomes, voter access, election administration and protection against foreign interference.

Derek Merrin

Republican Challenger — U.S. House (OH-09)

Use of Force: AmberRule of Law: AmberElection Integrity: Red

1. Use of Force — Amber

AMBER

What the Record Shows

  • Merrin has supported strong border enforcement, including an increased U.S. military presence at the southern border, but his public record provides limited evidence on the constitutional constraints governing domestic deployment of federal force.
  • He has expressed support for President Trump's military action against Iran, but the available record provides limited evidence defining his position on Congress's Article I war powers versus presidential authority to initiate or continue hostilities.

Why Amber

Merrin's public positions generally favor robust federal enforcement and national defense, but the available record provides limited evidence on the constitutional limits CIU examines under Use of Force, particularly presidential war powers and congressional authorization of military action.

Because the evidence does not establish a sufficiently developed record on these constitutional questions, this is principally a limited-evidence case, rather than one demonstrating a clear pattern in either direction.

2. Rule of Law & Oversight — Amber

AMBER

What the Record Shows

  • Merrin was identified in a federal trial exhibit as part of “Team Householder,” candidates whom prosecutors said Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder supported with dark money while seeking their backing for his speakership and the FirstEnergy bailout. Merrin later voted for HB 6, the legislation at the center of the $60 million bribery scheme. Merrin was never charged with wrongdoing in the scandal.
  • After the scheme became public and Householder was federally indicted, Merrin still voted against expelling him from the Ohio House.
  • In 2023, Merrin subsequently sought to repeal remaining HB 6 subsidies and introduced the Ethics and Financial Disclosure Reform Act, expanding lobbying and financial-disclosure requirements and restricting public officials from serving on corporate boards.

Why Amber

The most relevant oversight issue is Merrin’s vote against expelling Householder after his federal indictment, when the legislature faced a direct question of accountability for one of its own members.

Merrin’s HB 6 vote and politically troubling connections to Householder and FirstEnergy provide context, but do not establish that he knew of or participated in the corruption scheme; Merrin was not charged with wrongdoing.

His subsequent ethics and disclosure reforms and support for repealing remaining HB 6 subsidies provide meaningful countervailing evidence, leaving a mixed record on government accountability.

3. Election Integrity — Red

RED

What the Record Shows

  • Merrin cosponsored and voted for Ohio HB 458, which imposed stricter photo-ID requirements for in-person voting, shortened absentee and provisional-ballot cure periods, limited each county to one ballot drop box, and eliminated the final Monday of early voting. Opponents estimated that more than 800,000 voting-eligible Ohioans lacked the state-issued identification required under the new standard and would need to obtain qualifying ID to vote in person.
  • He subsequently supported the federal SAVE Act, which would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register for federal elections, and criticized opposition to the measure.

Why Red

HB 458 strengthened identity-verification requirements but also narrowed several avenues available to lawful voters to cast or correct their ballots, potentially making participation more difficult for otherwise eligible citizens.

Merrin's support for the SAVE Act extends that approach by requiring documentary citizenship proof, a requirement that can create additional barriers for eligible citizens who lack readily available qualifying documents.

Taken together, these actions show a consistent penchant for tighter election controls even where those requirements can increase the burden on lawful voters.

Sources

Max Miller

  1. U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk. (September 15, 2026). Roll Call 307 — H.Con.Res. 93, Directing the President to Remove U.S. Armed Forces from Hostilities with Iran.
  2. U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk. (July 23, 2026). Roll Call 282 — H.Con.Res. 89, Directing the President to Remove U.S. Armed Forces from Hostilities with Iran.
  3. U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk. (June 3, 2026). Roll Call 199 — H.Con.Res. 86, Directing the President to Remove U.S. Armed Forces from Hostilities with Iran.
  4. U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk. (May 14, 2026). Roll Call 170 — H.Con.Res. 75, Iran War Powers Resolution.
  5. WVXU. (January 29, 2026). U.S. Rep. Max Miller: ICE Enforcement in Ohio “Would Not Be Like Minneapolis”.
  6. U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk. (July 22, 2026). Roll Call 280 — H.R. 7008, Stop Insider Trading Act.
  7. The Washington Times. (August 1, 2023). Congress Wrestles With How to Expunge Donald Trump’s Impeachments.
  8. Ohio Capital Journal. (October 13, 2022). Ohio Republicans Up and Down the Ballot Claimed Fraud in 2020 Election.
  9. U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk. (April 10, 2025). Roll Call 102 — H.R. 22, SAVE Act.
  10. U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk. (February 11, 2026). Roll Call 69 — H.R. 7296, SAVE America Act.

Brian Poindexter

  1. News 5 Cleveland. (February 2, 2026). “This One Hit Pretty Hard”: Hundreds Gather in Cleveland to Remember VA Nurse Killed by ICE Agents.
  2. Spectrum News 1. (October 13, 2026). Poindexter Calls for an End to the Iran War.
  3. Cleveland.com. (April 9, 2026). Eight Democrats Want to Take on This Ohio Congressman — and He's Not Taking Any of Them Seriously.
  4. Brian Poindexter for Congress. Corruption.
  5. Brian Poindexter for Congress. Law Enforcement.
  6. C-SPAN. (August 15, 2026). U.S. Representative Candidate Brian Poindexter (D-OH) Holds Town Hall in Medina.

Marcy Kaptur

  1. U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk. (July 23, 2026). Roll Call 282 — H.Con.Res. 89, Directing the President to Remove U.S. Armed Forces from Hostilities with Iran.
  2. Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur. (February 3, 2026). Kaptur Votes to Reopen Government, Protect NW Ohio Priorities, Presses for ICE and CBP Reforms and Constitutional Accountability.
  3. Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur. (June 21, 2018). Kaptur floor speech on ICE raids in Ohio, calls on Trump to "stop the barbaric tactics."
  4. Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur. (2026). Kaptur Calls for Transparency and Oversight, Rejecting Latest Homeland Security Funding Bill.
  5. U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk. (April 12, 2024). Roll Call 114 — Amendment to H.R. 7888, Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act.
  6. U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk. (April 12, 2024). Roll Call 119 — H.R. 7888, Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act.
  7. House Committee on Appropriations. (June 4, 2026). GAO Investigation Requested by Kaptur, Murray Confirms Energy Department Illegally Steered Funding Away from Clean Energy.
  8. House Committee on Appropriations. (September 18, 2026). Kaptur, Murray Demand Energy Department Restore Eliminated Safety Rules, Justify Rewrite of Dozens of Critical Safety and Accountability Measures.
  9. U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk. (July 22, 2026). Roll Call 280 — H.R. 7008, Stop Insider Trading Act.
  10. U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. (May 3, 2019). Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Householder — Opinion and Kaptur Testimony on Ohio Congressional Redistricting.
  11. U.S. Government Publishing Office. (January 3, 2019). H.R. 92 — Vote By Mail Act of 2019.
  12. U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk. (April 10, 2025). Roll Call 102 — H.R. 22, SAVE Act.

Derek Merrin

  1. The Blade. (September 20, 2024). U.S. House Candidate Derek Merrin Visits Southern Border Ahead of Election.
  2. Guides.vote. (2026). 2026 Ohio 9th Congressional District Voter Guide — Derek Merrin.
  3. Ohio General Assembly, House Bill 6, 133rd General Assembly. (October 22, 2019). HB 6 — Legislative Record.
  4. Ohio Capital Journal. (October 16, 2024). Ohio Capital Journal — HB 6 / “Team Householder”.
  5. Ohio Capital Journal. (June 16, 2021). Ohio Capital Journal — Householder Expulsion Vote.
  6. Ohio General Assembly, House Bill 16, Ethics and Financial Disclosure Reform Act, 135th General Assembly. (Introduced February 15, 2023). HB 16 — Legislative Record.
  7. Ohio General Assembly, House Bill 120, 135th General Assembly. (Introduced March 16, 2023). HB 120 — Legislative Record.
  8. Ohio General Assembly, House Bill 458, 134th General Assembly. (April 7, 2023). HB 458 — Legislative Record.
  9. Ohio House of Representatives, House Bill 458 — Roll Call Votes. (December 14, 2022). HB 458 — Votes.
  10. Ohio Legislative Service Commission, House Bill 458 — Final Analysis and Fiscal Materials. (2022–2023). HB 458 — Legislative Analysis.
  11. Ohio Secretary of State. (February 7, 2023). Ohio Secretary of State — HB 458 Implementation.
  12. Derek Merrin for Congress. (July 11, 2024). Merrin Statement — SAVE Act and Ohio Photo-ID Law.