How to Read This
Colors reflect constitutional accountability based on publicly verifiable conduct. They are not endorsements or predictions of election outcomes. Ratings reflect the severity, pattern, and context of conduct.
Michigan · U.S. Senate
MI Constitutional Accountability Scorecard — Summary Table
| Contest & Candidate | Use of Force | Rule of Law | Election Integrity |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Senate | |||
| Abdul El-Sayed (D) | |||
| Mike Rogers (R) |
U.S. Senate — Candidate Assessments
Abdul El-Sayed
Democratic Nominee — U.S. Senate
1. Use of Force —
AMBERWhat the Record Shows
- Directly characterized U.S. military action against Iran as illegal for proceeding without congressional authorization.
- Characterized the January 6 attack as political violence against the constitutional transfer of power and argued for accountability.
- Has called for abolishing ICE, citing abusive and unlawful enforcement practices, but has provided limited detail about how immigration enforcement and border security should be conducted within constitutional safeguards.
- In 2020, supported reallocating some police and incarceration spending toward public health and other community services, describing that approach as consistent with the “defund” movement; more recently has emphasized a legitimate role for law enforcement alongside alternative community-based responses.
Why Amber
El-Sayed has articulated clear constitutional restraints on military action, political violence, and coercive law enforcement.
However, his record is considerably clearer about opposing government force he considers abusive than about defining how legitimate law-enforcement and border-security authority should be exercised within constitutional limits.
His evolving position on policing and a record based primarily on stated positions rather than demonstrated application of these principles leave the overall record mixed rather than sufficiently established for Green.
2. Rule of Law / Oversight —
AMBERWhat the Record Shows
- Publicly stated that the constitutional foundation of democratic government includes the right to peaceful protest and freedom of expression, and that the use of state power to suppress those rights represents a constitutional violation.
- Has explicitly stated opposition to the “weaponization of the state” to curtail or intimidate peaceful protest as a constitutional constraint on executive authority under the First Amendment.
- Has a limited public record addressing broader institutional checks such as congressional oversight, Inspector General independence, judicial authority, or separation-of-powers disputes.
Why Amber
El-Sayed has articulated First Amendment protections and opposition to the weaponization of government authority as constraints on executive power.
However, the available record provides limited affirmative evidence of defending broader institutional checks and independent oversight when tested.
3. Election Integrity —
AMBERWhat the Record Shows
- Publicly opposed the SAVE Act, arguing that it would impose unnecessary barriers on eligible voters without a demonstrated election-security need.
- Characterized the January 6 attack as an assault on the democratic certification process requiring constitutional accountability at the time of the event.
- No documented record of promoting false claims about certified election results or questioning the legitimacy of certified electoral outcomes.
Why Amber
El-Sayed has defended the constitutional integrity of the 2020 certification process and opposed election legislation he argues would unnecessarily burden lawful voters.
However, the available record provides limited affirmative evidence regarding certified election outcomes, independent election administration, or other major tests of election integrity.
Mike Rogers
Republican Nominee — U.S. Senate
1. Use of Force —
AMBERWhat the Record Shows
- Following January 6, publicly attributed direct responsibility to President Trump, stating that his actions “clearly” provoked the assault and characterizing the attack as a constitutional violation.
- Addressed the Iran War as a Senate candidate by acknowledging broad executive command authority and suggesting congressional involvement without invoking specific constitutional or statutory standards, and publicly stated he would vote to maintain the President’s authority to continue the conflict.
- Following controversial fatal ICE enforcement actions, emphasized support for law enforcement and public safety while providing little public discussion of use-of-force standards, constitutional restraints, or accountability for federal officers.
Why Amber
Rogers forcefully condemned the January 6 attack and assigned responsibility for provoking the violence.
However, his positions on the Iran War and federal immigration enforcement reflect broad deference to executive and law-enforcement authority, with limited emphasis on congressional authority, constitutional restraint, or accountability governing the use of force.
2. Rule of Law & Oversight —
REDWhat the Record Shows
- Characterized multiple prosecutions of President Trump as politically motivated persecution, questioning the legitimacy and impartiality of the justice system without presenting evidence of prosecutorial misconduct.
- Portrayed prospective Senate subpoenas and congressional scrutiny of Elon Musk's DOGE activities as political retaliation and told supporters that electing him would help “shield” Musk from that oversight.
- More recently has repeatedly challenged the legitimacy of institutional accountability directed at political allies, marking a departure from his earlier record condemning January 6 and defending the certified 2020 election outcome.
Why Red
Rogers's recent record reflects a repeated pattern of delegitimizing independent accountability mechanisms when they are directed at political allies.
He has characterized multiple prosecutions of President Trump as politically motivated persecution and portrayed prospective congressional scrutiny of Elon Musk's DOGE activities as political retaliation, while telling supporters that electing him would help “shield” Musk from that oversight.
Although Rogers previously demonstrated greater respect for institutional accountability, his more recent conduct represents a significant departure from that record and raises serious concerns about his current commitment to constitutional checks and independent oversight.
3. Election Integrity —
REDWhat the Record Shows
- Publicly defended Michigan’s certified 2020 election results and characterized unfounded fraud claims as “conspiracy and hearsay,” directly characterizing the refusal to accept certified outcomes as anti-constitutional. Publicly criticized Trump’s attempts to influence Michigan’s electoral process and called on him to peacefully transition power.
- One year after conceding his 2024 Michigan Senate loss and a standard audit confirming the certified outcome, made repeated public claims without evidence that a van carrying fraudulent ballots appeared at a Detroit counting location and cost him the election. His campaign declined to provide evidence when pressed by multiple news organizations.
Why Red
Rogers explicitly invoked the constitutional obligation to accept certified election results in 2020, applying that standard by name.
He then selectively abandoned it following his own 2024 certified defeat, in the absence of any new evidence and in direct contradiction of the official audit record.
Promoting unsupported claims that fraud altered his own certified election outcome, despite an audit confirming the result, constitutes a documented breach of election integrity under CIU standards and is particularly significant given Rogers's own prior articulation of the obligation to accept certified outcomes.
Sources
Abdul El-Sayed
- Michigan Advance. (October 15, 2025). El-Sayed, McMorrow highlight free speech policy at U.S. Senate forum focused on Muslim community.
- The State News. (April 7, 2026). Abdul El-Sayed denounces Iran War, calls for abolishing ICE in campus rally.
- BallotReady. (2026). Abdul El-Sayed candidate positions — SAVE Act and peaceful protest.
- Abdul El-Sayed Campaign. (March 2026). El-Sayed: Trump Promised to End Endless Wars — Instead, He Started One.
- WDET Detroit Public Radio. (June 23, 2020). Former Gubernatorial Candidate Abdul El-Sayed On Policing and Public Health.
- CNN. (November 10, 2025). Reporting on El-Sayed's previous “defund the police” statements and deleted social-media posts.
- The Detroit News. (November 15, 2025). El-Sayed distances himself from past “defund the police” rhetoric and discusses the legitimate role of law enforcement.
- Al-Monitor. (August 2026). Abdul El-Sayed becomes first Muslim-American to win Michigan Senate primary
- NPR. (August 5, 2026). Abdul El-Sayed, Michigan's Democratic Senate nominee, discusses the race.
- Time. (July 8, 2026). How Abdul El-Sayed Is Running Against Both Parties.
Mike Rogers
- CNN. (October 20, 2024). How a one-time GOP critic found alliance with Trump in pivotal Michigan Senate race.
- Michigan Advance. (March 11, 2024). Trump endorses Rogers in Michigan GOP Senate race.
- Michigan Advance. (September 25, 2023). Republican Mike Rogers slams DOJ prosecution of Trump.
- Detroit Metro Times. (July 22, 2026). Mike Rogers begs Michiganders for money to ‘protect’ Elon Musk.
- The New York Times. (August 9, 2026). Michigan Senate Candidate, a Former Trump Critic, Shifts Toward Election Skepticism.
- Michigan Advance. (November 21, 2025). Mike Rogers once denounced election denial of the 2020 election. Now, he's surrounded by it.
- WLNS 6 News. (November 10, 2025). Mike Rogers claims he lost 2024 Senate election due to 'van in Detroit' that 'showed up with ballots.'
- Washington Post. (January 5, 2021). The election was free and fair. This needs to end — for the sake of our democracy.