How Ratings Are Determined

Every candidate is evaluated against the same published standards, using publicly verifiable evidence.

  • The evidenceVotes and legislation, public statements and documented actions, and findings by courts, election authorities or ethics bodies.
  • The standardConduct, not ideology. Intent is not inferred, and silence is never scored as a violation.
  • The sourcesEvery assessment is documented, with full sources listed at the bottom of each scorecard.
Read the full methodology →

How to Read This

Colors reflect constitutional accountability based on publicly verifiable conduct. They are not endorsements or predictions of election outcomes. Ratings reflect the severity, pattern, and context of conduct.

Green — Clear constitutional compliance / restraint
Amber — Mixed, limited, or under-articulated record
Red — Clear or repeated constitutional breach

New Hampshire · U.S. Senate

NH Constitutional Accountability Scorecard — Summary Table

Contest & Candidate Use of Force Rule of Law Election Integrity
U.S. Senate
John E. Sununu (R)
Chris Pappas (D)

U.S. Senate — Candidate Assessments

John E. Sununu

Republican Candidate — U.S. Senate

Use of Force: AmberRule of Law: GreenElection Integrity: Amber

1. Use of Force — Amber

AMBER

What the Record Shows

  • Initially defended the strategic rationale for the 2026 military action against Iran while acknowledging Congress's constitutional war powers and arguing that presidents may act first against imminent threats.
  • Later said he would not have initiated the Iran conflict and called entering without an adequate plan a mistake, while continuing to argue that weakening Iran's nuclear, missile and proxy capabilities served U.S. security interests.
  • Has called for Congress to reclaim constitutional authority ceded over time to the executive branch, particularly over spending and tariffs, while separately stating that prolonged military commitments require congressional authorization.
  • Defended ICE agents' use of masks during enforcement operations as a legitimate means of protecting agents and their families from threats and doxxing, and argued that immigration enforcement does not necessarily provide immigrants the same process available in other legal contexts.

Why Amber

Sununu's record recognizes Congress's constitutional war-making authority and includes an explicit call for Congress to reclaim powers ceded to the executive branch.

At the same time, he has accepted considerable presidential latitude to use military force without prior congressional approval and has defended broad federal immigration-enforcement practices when challenged on accountability and due-process grounds.

His record therefore combines mixed support for constitutional restraints on government force with substantial deference to executive and law-enforcement authority.

2. Rule of Law & Oversight — Green

GREEN

What the Record Shows

  • Joined a bipartisan filibuster blocking reauthorization of the USA PATRIOT Act sought by the Bush administration and Senate Republican leadership, citing inadequate civil-liberties protections, and subsequently helped negotiate additional safeguards.
  • Became the first Republican in Congress to call for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales's removal, citing the dismissal of U.S. attorneys as well as concerns arising from a Justice Department Inspector General report on the FBI's use of National Security Letters.
  • More recently called for Congress to reclaim constitutional powers ceded to presidents of both parties, particularly congressional authority over spending and tariffs.
  • Supported the 2008 FISA Amendments Act that established Section 702 surveillance authority, while elsewhere challenging warrantless domestic surveillance and advocating congressional and judicial safeguards against government surveillance abuses.

Why Green

Sununu's record contains substantial affirmative evidence of protecting civil liberties and institutional checks, including securing additional PATRIOT Act safeguards, challenging Justice Department oversight failures, and calling for Congress to reclaim constitutional authority from presidents of both parties.

His 2008 vote for the FISA Amendments Act, which established Section 702 surveillance authority, is a significant counterpoint, reflecting greater deference to federal surveillance powers and raising a civil-liberties concern within an otherwise substantial record of constitutional checks and safeguards.

3. Election Integrity — Amber

AMBER

What the Record Shows

  • Co-chaired the New Hampshire chapter of the bipartisan Democracy Defense Project, working with former Democratic Congressman Richard Swett, state election officials and others to promote confidence in lawful election processes and defend election administration against misinformation.
  • Cited the 2020 election as evidence of institutional resilience, noting that states certified their results and allegations of fraud were adjudicated and overwhelmingly found invalid.
  • Publicly supported additional federal voter-identification requirements and, when asked about the SAVE Act, advocated repeatedly attaching a photo-ID requirement to must-pass legislation, citing New Hampshire's voter-ID system as a model.

Why Amber

Sununu has affirmatively supported certified election outcomes and independent election administration, including bipartisan work promoting confidence in lawful election processes.

His support for the SAVE Act backs documentary proof-of-citizenship requirements that have already prevented eligible citizens in New Hampshire from registering to vote, including people lacking required documents or whose names no longer match their citizenship records.

Taken together, the record is mixed: Sununu has affirmatively supported certified election outcomes and independent election administration, while also supporting voting requirements that have demonstrably created barriers for eligible voters in New Hampshire. Under CIU's criteria, that combination does not establish a consistently strong record on election integrity.

Chris Pappas

Democratic Candidate — U.S. Senate

Use of Force: GreenRule of Law: AmberElection Integrity: Green

1. Use of Force — Green

GREEN

What the Record Shows

  • Condemned the January 6 attack as an effort to interfere with certification and the peaceful transfer of power, voted to impeach President Trump for incitement of insurrection, and later opposed pardons for January 6 defendants.
  • Called for an independent and transparent investigation into the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent and supported greater accountability and guardrails governing federal immigration enforcement.
  • Repeatedly voted for War Powers resolutions directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran and stated that President Trump had initiated military operations without congressional authorization.

Why Green

Pappas has a substantial record of affirmative support for constitutional restraints on government force, including repeated defense of congressional war powers, accountability for federal law enforcement, and opposition to political violence.

His record demonstrates support for both congressional authority over military action and accountability when federal law-enforcement power is exercised.

2. Rule of Law & Oversight — Amber

AMBER

What the Record Shows

  • Voted for both articles of impeachment in 2019, citing abuse of presidential power, obstruction of congressional oversight and the principle that no individual, including the President, is above the law.
  • Voted to establish both the bipartisan national commission and the House Select Committee to investigate the January 6 attack.
  • Joined a bicameral Supreme Court brief defending Congress's Article I authority over tariffs and supported congressional actions seeking to constrain presidential tariff authority.
  • Voted against a 2024 amendment that would have required a warrant before searching Americans' communications collected under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
  • Voted for the Laken Riley Act, which expanded mandatory detention of certain noncitizens based on arrest or charges before conviction. Despite due-process concerns raised by critics, Pappas said the measure would strengthen federal law enforcement, while also supporting bipartisan immigration reform combining border security with a pathway to citizenship.

Why Amber

Pappas's record contains substantial affirmative evidence of supporting congressional oversight, separation of powers and executive accountability, including impeachment, January 6 investigations and efforts to protect Congress's constitutional authority over tariffs.

Alongside that record are two significant individual-liberty concerns: his Section 702 vote reflected greater deference to federal surveillance authority, while his Laken Riley Act vote supported mandatory detention in specified cases before conviction, raising civil-liberties and due-process concerns.

3. Election Integrity — Green

GREEN

What the Record Shows

  • Supported certification of the 2020 presidential election results and condemned January 6 as an effort to stop certification of a free and fair election and the peaceful transfer of power.
  • Publicly defended New Hampshire's election system, including its use of voter identification and paper ballots, and criticized efforts to undermine confidence in lawful election results.
  • Voted against the SAVE Act, arguing that its federal requirements would burden eligible voters including married women, military families and seniors.
  • Cosponsored 2026 legislation seeking to nullify an executive order restricting mail voting, arguing that election administration belongs to the states and that Congress should protect lawful access to mail voting.

Why Green

Pappas has consistently supported certified election outcomes and the peaceful transfer of power, defended state election administration and lawful ballot access, and taken legislative action against federal executive restrictions on mail voting.

His record reflects affirmative support for election legitimacy and established election processes.

Sources

John E. Sununu

  1. New Hampshire Public Radio. (July 27, 2026). From Iran war to the economy, differences emerge in NH's Republican Senate primary.
  2. New Hampshire Public Radio. (August 28, 2026). Primary conversations: Sununu says Congress should take back powers from executive branch.
  3. CNN. (June 2, 2025). CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip — Transcript.
  4. NPR. (December 14, 2005). Congress Mulls Renewal of Patriot Act.
  5. NPR. (February 10, 2006). GOP Senators Reach Compromise on Patriot Act Renewal.
  6. CBS News. (March 14, 2007). GOP Senator Calls For Gonzales' Firing.
  7. U.S. Senate. (July 9, 2008). Senate Roll Call Vote No. 168 — FISA Amendments Act of 2008.
  8. New Hampshire Journal. (April 28, 2025). Getting 'Up To Speed' With John E. Sununu and Dick Swett on the State of Our Elections.
  9. The Boston Globe. (October 18, 2024). To defend democracy, these N.H. leaders plan to help voters see clearly in the post-election fog.
  10. Citizens Count. (2026). John E. Sununu candidate profile.
  11. New Hampshire Public Radio. (February 9, 2026). Trial begins over fate of NH’s proof-of-citizenship voter law.
  12. New Hampshire Public Radio. (May 29, 2026). A judge struck down NH’s ‘proof of citizenship’ voting law. Here's what to know.
  13. Brennan Center for Justice. (June 3, 2026). States Already Enacting Harmful SAVE Act Policies, Requiring Proof of Citizenship to Vote.

Chris Pappas

  1. Rep. Chris Pappas. (March 5, 2026). Pappas Statement on War Powers Resolution.
  2. U.S. House Clerk. (June 3, 2026). Iran War Powers Resolution: H.Con.Res. 86.
  3. Congressional Equality Caucus. (January 10, 2026). Openly-LGBTQI+ U.S. Representatives Condemn I.C.E. Killing of LGBTQI+ Woman in Minnesota.
  4. Citizens Count. (2026). Christopher Pappas congressional record.
  5. Rep. Chris Pappas. (January 13, 2021). Pappas Joins Bipartisan Vote to Impeach President Trump Following Deadly Insurrection at U.S. Capitol.
  6. New Hampshire Public Radio. (December 16, 2019). Pappas Says He Will Vote For Impeachment.
  7. Rep. Chris Pappas. (May 19, 2021). Pappas Votes to Create Bipartisan National Commission to Investigate the January 6 Attack.
  8. Rep. Chris Pappas. (June 30, 2021). Pappas Votes To Establish House Panel To Investigate January 6th Insurrection.
  9. Rep. Chris Pappas. (May 7, 2024). Pappas Calls for Action on Southern Border.
  10. New Hampshire Bulletin. (January 8, 2025). Pappas, Goodlander among 48 Democrats to join House GOP in passing immigrant detention bill.
  11. Rep. Chris Pappas. (October 29, 2025). Pappas Backs Bicameral Amicus Brief to Supreme Court Challenging Trump's Tariffs.
  12. U.S. House Clerk. (April 12, 2024). Biggs Amendment to H.R. 7888, Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act.
  13. Rep. Chris Pappas. (April 10, 2025). Pappas Statement on the SAVE Act.
  14. Rep. Chris Pappas. (May 13, 2026). Pappas Helps Introduce Legislation to Protect Mail-in Voting Against Unlawful Trump Executive Order.
  15. U.S. Government Publishing Office. (May 7, 2026). Vote by Mail Protection Act of 2026 — H.R. 8666.